Field Insider
Head to head+ New comparison
Full-back · Bournemouth
56.6season
vs
Full-back · Manchester City
56.4season

A. Truffert has the better season — 56.6 vs 56.4 season rating.

Too close to callHead-to-head analysis

On current form there's almost nothing between them — Truffert grades 57 this season to O'Reilly's 56. Truffert brings 1G/5A and 4.287 defensive actions/90; O'Reilly 5G/3A and 3.399 defensive actions/90.

Their long-term ceilings are level — Rating 96 (Truffert) and 97 (O'Reilly). At 24 vs 21, O'Reilly has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.

By market value, Truffert is the pricier asset (192.2 to 174.1). Year-on-year, Truffert (value 192.2, season +16.7% YoY) and O'Reilly (value 174.1, season +390.4% YoY) — with Truffert on the pitch for 98.8% of available minutes to O'Reilly's 77.4%.

Ratings

56.6
Season rating
56.4
96.1
Rating (talent + age)
96.7
115.3
Market value index
104.4

Season stats

38
Appearances
34
1
Goals
5
5
Assists
3
3380
Minutes
2648

Per 90

0.027
Goals / 90
0.17
0.133
Assists / 90
0.102
0.16
Goal contribution / 90
0.272
4.287
Defensive actions / 90
3.399

Context

98.8%
Minutes played %
77.4%
91
Age potential
97