Head to head+ New comparison
Lamine Yamal has the better season — 93.5 vs 80.9 season rating.
Yamal on topHead-to-head analysis
Yamal has the better season, a 94 to Godts's 81 — a 13-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Yamal is posting 16G/11A (1.071/90), against 17G/13A (0.932/90) for Godts.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Yamal (100 to 84). At 19 vs 21, Yamal has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Yamal is the pricier asset (91.7 to 58.3). Year-on-year, Yamal (value 91.7, season +49.1% YoY) and Godts (value 58.3, season +238.5% YoY) — with Yamal on the pitch for 86.9% of available minutes to Godts's 91.9%.
Ratings
93.5
Season rating
80.9
100
Rating (talent + age)
84.3
137.6
Market value index
55.9
Season stats
28
Appearances
34
16
Goals
17
11
Assists
13
2268
Minutes
2896
Per 90
0.635
Goals / 90
0.528
0.437
Assists / 90
0.404
1.071
Goal contribution / 90
0.932
1.786
Defensive actions / 90
1.523
Context
86.9%
Minutes played %
91.9%
99
Age potential
97

