Head to head+ New comparison
J. Timber has the better season — 81.8 vs 74.5 season rating.
Timber on topHead-to-head analysis
Timber has the better season, a 82 to Allister's 75 — a 7-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Timber is posting 3G/5A and 3.516 defensive actions/90, against 1G/1A and 5.363 defensive actions/90 for Allister.
On talent/ceiling our Rating favours Timber (97 to 44). At 25 vs 28, Timber has more road ahead, which lifts his ceiling.
By market value, Timber is the pricier asset (194.6 to 14). Year-on-year, Timber (value 194.6, season +99% YoY) and Allister (value 14, season +9.1% YoY) — with Timber on the pitch for 88.1% of available minutes to Allister's 81.6%.
Ratings
81.8
Season rating
74.5
97.3
Rating (talent + age)
44.3
163.6
Market value index
14
Season stats
30
Appearances
34
3
Goals
1
5
Assists
1
2457
Minutes
2937
Per 90
0.11
Goals / 90
0.031
0.183
Assists / 90
0.031
0.293
Goal contribution / 90
0.061
3.516
Defensive actions / 90
5.363
Context
88.1%
Minutes played %
81.6%
88
Age potential
62