Head to head+ New comparison
J. Timber has the better season — 81.8 vs 44.5 season rating.
Timber on topHead-to-head analysis
Timber has the better season, a 82 to Szoboszlai's 45 — a 37-point edge on our age-blind form rating. Timber is posting 3G/5A and 3.516 defensive actions/90, against 6G/7A (0.361/90) for Szoboszlai.
Their long-term ceilings are level — Rating 97 (Szoboszlai) and 97 (Timber).
By market value, Timber is the pricier asset (194.6 to 193.4). Year-on-year, Szoboszlai (value 193.4, season +7.5% YoY) and Timber (value 194.6, season +99% YoY) — with Szoboszlai on the pitch for 100% of available minutes to Timber's 88.1%.
Ratings
44.5
Season rating
81.8
96.7
Rating (talent + age)
97.3
116
Market value index
163.6
Season stats
36
Appearances
30
6
Goals
3
7
Assists
5
3244
Minutes
2457
Per 90
0.166
Goals / 90
0.11
0.194
Assists / 90
0.183
0.361
Goal contribution / 90
0.293
2.58
Defensive actions / 90
3.516
Context
100%
Minutes played %
88.1%
88
Age potential
88